<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="utf-8">
    <channel>
        <title>Pembina Institute's Green Economics News</title>
        <description>Latest media releases, op-eds, publications and blog posts from Green Economics.</description>
        <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/</link>
        <language>en</language>
        <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
        <generator> </generator>
        <managingEditor>rssadmin@pembina.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>rssadmin@pembina.org</webMaster>
                <item>
            <title>Green energy upgrade protects Ontarians from rising nuclear costs   (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/2060</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/2060</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Choosing to scale
up green energy to replace the retiring Pickering nuclear station is more
affordable for Ontarians than buying expensive replacement reactors, says a
report released today by Renewable is Doable, an alliance of organizations
including the Pembina Institute, the Canadian Environmental Law Association and
Greenpeace.  Last summer, Ontario
suspended its purchase of two new replacement reactors when their cost
reportedly topped $26 billion — $20 billion more than expected in 2007. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Renewable Is Doable Group</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina Institute Comments on Canada’s Proposed Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/2055</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/2055</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Pembina's analysis finds the proposed federal regulations for
tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles and light
trucks may have little to no effect on reducing climate change
pollution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matthew Bramley, PJ Partington</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Federal government out of step with leading thinkers on sustainability, climate and energy issues: survey (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/2041</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/2041</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The federal government is out of step with leading thinkers on issues 
related to sustainability, energy and climate change, according to the 
results of a groundbreaking survey of more than 5,000 experts and 
government officials.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marlo Raynolds</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The 2010 Global Thought Leader Survey on Sustainability (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/2040</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/2040</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The views of more than 5,000 sustainability thought leaders
in Canada, the U.S. and Europe are outlined in &lt;em&gt;The 2010 Global 
Thought Leader Survey on Sustainability.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>McAllister Opinion Research</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Dig Baby, Dig (made possible by ongoing government subsidization) (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/47</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/47</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
If anyone is still not convinced that our ongoing
subsidization of fossil fuel consumption is irrational (to say the least), a
recent statistic released by the International Energy Agency (IEA) should prove
convincing.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2008, the world economy subsidized oil consumption to the
tune of US$557 billion in developing countries and provided as much as US$100 billion in subsidies to
oil production in developed countries. Meanwhile, the top five earning publicly traded oil companies reaped $US150
billion in profits (
ExxonMobil $US45.2 billion, Royal Dutch Shell $US31.4 billion, BP $US25.6
billion, Chevron $US29.3 billion). According to the report by the IEA, this level of subsidy, if
removed, could reduce oil consumption by 850 million tonnes (6.7 billion
barrels) by 2020- the combined consumption of Japan, South Korea, Australia and
New Zealand or 13 years of oil sands production at current rates of extraction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Mike Kennedy</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The economics of an oil spill (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/46</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/46</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I was flying over the Gulf of
Mexico when I first learned about British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon oil
spill. At 30,000 feet from my plane window the oil spill looked something like
a tailings pond surrounded by an ocean of blue. As anyone who is following the
news coverage knows, this small pond of oil has spread into what may be the
worst environmental disaster of this century and it will turn into quite the
economic disaster as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Mike Kennedy</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Gulf spill spells bad news for Enbridge pipeline (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/op-ed/2007</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/op-ed/2007</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10px; line-height: normal;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.334; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px;&quot;&gt;As oil gushes into the Gulf of Mexico, the consequences of a spill from the proposed Enbridge oilsands pipeline and related tanker traffic are all the more real.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Karen Campbell</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Ontario to spend $8 billion on renewable energy (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1997</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1997</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;As part of the Green Energy Act Alliance, Pembina applauds Ontario's plans to spend $8 billion on renewable energy projects. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Green Energy Act Alliance, Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina reacts to new federal vehicle regulations (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1990</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1990</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Cherise Burda says Canada is taking an &quot;America Lite&quot; approach with the
announcement of new federal vehicle emissions regulations. While
Canada's regulations match the U.S. requirements for passenger
vehiclees, Canada is not matching the level of federal support that the
Obama administration has announced for public transit and vehicle
efficiency.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>New analysis compares U.S. and Canadian investments in sustainable energy in 2010 (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1983</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1983</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Pembina's analysis shows the
U.S. is set to outspend Canada nearly 18:1 per capita on renewables,
and more than 8:1 per capita overall on sustainable energy programs and
projects in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina Reacts to 2010 Federal Budget (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1976</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1976</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The 2010 federal budget could hardly do less on renewable energy and climate change issues, said &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tim Weis, Director of the Pembina Institute's Renewable Energy and
Energy Efficiency Program.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>At a Crossroads (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/1977</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/1977</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The Canadian government, as a resource manager for the Northwest
Territories' oil and gas resources, is at a crossroads — it has to
decide how to manage oil and gas development in
the territory.
This fact sheet makes the case for a win-win development scenario, which would provide maximum benefit to the public (the resource owners), while allowing oil and gas companies to earn fair returns on
their investments. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Amy Taylor, Jennifer Grant</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Where did our green loonies go? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/43</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/43</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In response to the global economic downturn, many world
leaders have introduced significant economic stimulus packages in an effort to
ramp up economic development. Seizing the opportunity to kick-start a green
economy, forward-thinking governments are getting double-duty out of these
plans by dedicating a significant chunk of stimulus spending towards renewable
energy and efficiencies. Canada? Not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Amy Taylor</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina representative available for comment on federal budget (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1974</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1974</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A policy
expert from the Pembina Institute will be available for comment and analysis following the release
of the federal budget on March 4.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina Reacts to 2010 Speech from the Throne (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1975</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/media-release/1975</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew Bramley, Director of the Pembina Institute's Climate Change
Program, said today's federal Throne Speech&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;fails to clearly signal an improvement in the government's poor track
record on climate change and investment in the clean energy economy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matthew Bramley</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Personal debt shouldn’t make our economy look good (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/42</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/42</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;When federal finance minister Jim Flaherty recently announced changes
to the rules governing mortgage approvals in Canada, he took a first
step in recognizing we’ve been spending more than we’re making and
increasing our debt loads in an unsustainable way. If we were measuring our economic well-being in a more
holistic way, we’d have recognized the unsustainable debt levels long
ago and been able to take preventative measures.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Amy Taylor</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Congress vs. Parliament: Who will decide Canada’s climate policy? (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/op-ed/1968</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/op-ed/1968</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Marlo Raynolds argues that the real challenge for Canada's Prime Minister is whether he
is able to create a made-in-Canada climate plan — or leave it to American lawmakers
to decide our climate and, therefore, economic policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marlo Raynolds</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Using the Market to Fix the Environment (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/41</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/41</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think that the only thing needed for better
environmental policy was a government that could stand up to polluters. While this
still may be the most effective approach in some instances, these days, I realize
the issues are more complex. In some situations, direct financial incentives
may be an effective way to improve environmental quality. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Mike Kennedy</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>At a Crossroads (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/1959</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/pub/1959</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Canadian government, as a resource manager for the Northwest
Territories' oil and gas resources, is at a crossroads — it has to decide
how to manage the development of the oil and gas resources in the territory. 
A win-win development scenario would allow companies to earn fair
returns on their investments while providing maximum benefit for resource
owners today and in the future. 
With a view to achieving a win-win development scenario for oil and gas developments in the territory, this discussion paper reviews and evaluates the existing Frontier Lands Petroleum Royalty
Regime; the system for awarding lease rights for oil and gas; and key opportunities for the Government of the Northwest
Territories to capture revenue from oil and gas developments within the
territory. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Amy Taylor, Peggy Holroyd, Jennifer Grant, Mike Kennedy, Katherine Mackenzie</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Resolving to &quot;Green&quot; Canada's Economy (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/40</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greeneconomics.ca/blog/40</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Time to crack open the 2010 calendar.
Another year gone by. The Christmas decorations are now back in storage, the
left-over turkey all gone, and the New Year's resolutions are firmly in hand.
This year, I decided to come up with a few green economics resolutions for
Canada.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Amy Taylor</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>
